Would you really want to live for longer? It is an appealing idea to slow down the aging process and retain the good looks and vibrant good health of your 20s, but there is a down side. Imagine having to work for double the amount of years. Instead of spending 40 years of your life caught up in the turmoil and intensity of paid employment, 80 years would be required. After that amount of time, even the most interesting job could become mundane. Maybe we would have to switch careers and go through learning and training years again. Ug!
The above 99-word flash was written for Charli Mills’ weekly flash fiction challenge. You can join in here: https://carrotranch.com/2019/05/10/may-9-flash-fiction-challenge/
Charli’s prompt also inspired the following longer piece:
From the diary of Dr Thompson
It is interesting to see how people cling to life. No matter how dire their circumstances or how old and dependent they are, they don’t want to die. Maybe it is because they are familiar with their current lives and can hope that their circumstances will improve, whereas death is the great unknown. Some people, of course, do not find succumbing to death to be a great leap of faith, but to many, the lack of clarity beyond the grave is disturbing.
I warned the World Government that they could not obviously favour one grouping of people over another when it came to the extension of life. This was more controversial in my view than their plan of genetic engineering to increase human intelligence. In my experience, not all people aspire to intellectual greatness.
The idea of the World Government was simple. Individuals who demonstrated the characteristics of higher performance and productivity were singled out and their personal identification microchips were programmed to use available biotechnology to change the genetic makeup of such individuals’ cells, slowing down their aging process and reversing the negative effects of heart disease and other stress and anxiety related health problems caused by their ambitious, rigidly organised, anxious and proactive personalities. This programme had two major effects on the selected individuals: they aged at a slower rate than their peers and their productive work lives increase from approximately 40 years to over 80 years and the genes that resulted in their high-functioning abilities were exacerbated in their children.
It did not take many years for the people living in the compounds for the unemployed to notice that their working peers were not aging at the same rate as they were. Men and women in high pressure jobs maintained the smooth skin and full bodied and richly coloured hair of their youth for many years. When the effects of time did finally start manifesting in their faces, the changes were subtle. They also maintained their robust good health and did not suffer arthritis, osteoporosis and other debilitating aging diseases. The rumblings of discontent in the ghettos and compounds increased as the inhabitants slowly came to the realisation that they were missing out on the opportunity of an extended life. The World Government denied any intervention in this area of humanity; it was not economical to have the unemployed living for longer. It only made sense for those people who would use this longer life for the benefit of society by increasing their skills and remain productive for longer.
The uprising, demonstration and unrest continued and the government resorted to using the military, a privileged group of men and women with unusually strong bodies, high endurance as well as high intelligence, to control the masses through whatever means they deemed necessary.
The other major issue that arose as a result of this genetic manipulation was that the human characteristics of anxiety and stress, which frequently went hand in hand with high performance and greater intelligence, increased in the children of the genetically engineered workers. Mental illnesses such as depression, PTSD, OCD, panic attacks and other, similar disorders became more apparent and troublesome among the working population. These negative effects had to be controlled through the use of an additional microchip implant aimed at controlling the amount of serotonin in sufferers brains but, the scientists soon realised, that the microchip and other medications only worked to a certain extent. They had a problem on their hands and it was not easily solvable as removing these negative aspects of human behaviour would also remove the personality traits government wanted desperately to retain.
I think if we lived for longer we might have a more vested interest in ensuring the environment would survive.
Living for longer sounds good but as someone who suffers from a serious lower back problems I don’t know if I’d want to live for that many more years if it meant I would have to continue living with that pain. At the moment I’m just surviving…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve had back issues since I was 18 so I never really had that “vibrant god health of my 20s”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am really sorry to hear that, Joanne. I also have back problems which have become progressively worse over time. Maybe these things could be repaired in the future. I would also not want to live an extra 100 years as a very old person in constant pain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I’d be happy with my lot… See a lot of suffering in old age that is just elongated nowadays…
LikeLiked by 1 person
To an extent, Ritu. I think it depends on a person’s health. Our granny is 97 and she still gets a lot of pleasure from life.
LikeLike
That is true too… 😜
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a thought isnt it, just going on. The upside would be so much more cricket to watch, the down that I’d probably need to buy more shoes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yip, and work soooo much longer. They say the first people to live to 200 have already been born, you can’t be retired for 135 years, can you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think aging slower sounds great. I think overpopulation would become an issue, though, which is why governments would want to be picky about who gets it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly, especially if the unemployment is higher due to increased digitalisation. Just thoughts on possible future situations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That second story goes to show why we shouldn’t attempt to manipulate science beyond certain measures. Good job, Robbie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Mae. I agree with you but still scientists go on pushing the boundaries.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a chilling concept: the unemployed don’t get to live as long. Well done, Robbie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Priscilla. Just another possibility for the future.
LikeLike
I’ve been working for 42 years since graduating and I am about to burst. The thought of doing this for 80 years – please, no.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am 22 years in and another 18 years sounds like more than enough. Thanks, Dan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If nobody’s dying, then we’ll all be packed upon this earth like sardines and fighting for any natural resources. What a nightmare.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that is already happening with longer life expectancies and more births and infant survivals. Even in Africa, where the average life expectancy is only 50 years old, the populations is rising steadily.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thought provoking, for sure
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Annette.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, wow, what a concept for your story, Robbie! It’s complex, too — though aging is slowed, other mental health issues arise. Great story!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Charli. Glad you liked this.
LikeLike
Great story, Robbie! I think I’ll live my days as they are, until the Man above tells me otherwise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, but we don’t always get to make the choice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Scary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I often think about all the comments of longer lifespans for people. That can only work if the aging process is slowed down making our productive working lives longer which is a problem currently with over population and not enough jobs. An interesting conundrum, Willow.
LikeLike
Yes indeed it is 💜💜
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have watched and read a many sci-fi programs about trying to select certain peoples to be or not be allowed to live longer than an allotted time. Some of those who are forced to exit end up as food for the living. I think that was a movie from 1973 Soylent Green based loosely on a book called ‘Make Room, Make Room’ – where again the Government/Big Business hides the truth.
It is worrisome that those who do wish to end their lives are told they must prolong their lives by any means (and that cost is not always recoverable). Perhaps some remember the famed Angel of Death doctor who aided those who wished not to suffer.
I do though remember reading a book about a pair of sisters who look like they are in their 70’s but are actually both over 100. They have seen so many changes… but they practice three hours of yoga a day and enjoy their independent lives. There are no clear cut answers. I enjoyed both your flash and the longer story, which has added some clarity to some of the other pieces I’ve read that you have written about the ‘brain implants’ / genetic manipulation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Jules. I am exploring some of the possible consequences of enhanced digitalisation, one of which is interference with genetics and lifespan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Soylent Green is people –
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have heard about it but never seen the film. I must look for it.
LikeLike